Wednesday, June 23, 2010

If a man called Palin a female dog (the appropriate term is b*tch) with lipstick, would he be a sexist?

Especially after she called herself one?If a man called Palin a female dog (the appropriate term is b*tch) with lipstick, would he be a sexist?
Well, she said it and I saw her say it on tv. What did she mean? Well, when O'bama called McCains economic plan was the same as the Bush plan he compared it to the old saying that putting lipstick on a pig didn't change a thing and that the pig was still a pig.


He was immediately accused of saying that it was about Mrs Palin, a mother of five including a downs syndorme baby and a five month old teen age girl.


I I guess if Mrs. Palin, described herself as you said she did, I would guess that it's the one thing she said that was correct.


She lies real easy.


thanksIf a man called Palin a female dog (the appropriate term is b*tch) with lipstick, would he be a sexist?
McCain/Palin used their as a metaphor of politics.





Barry Obummer used his to smear Palin... Which wasn't right. Hit the politics not the person.





Barry is melting down in front of everyone. He is having to use smear tactics(not saying republicans don't) and throw everything at them but the issues. Why because when it comes down to it... A Junior Senator with 1 year of experience and has socialist policies and socialist friends won't and can't win.
Truth hurts, She did indeed, but thats to keep the offense from saying any truth against them. Obama referred to McCain a pig with lipstick and McCain tried to pin it on someone else as sexist, only becuz he is good at it himself. Between Palin and McCain is is harder to tell who can twist the facts more, maybe they will start a tornado with all that wind, better yet they like to stretch things so much maybe they should go into the taffy business.


Even Oreiley said they were falsely accusing Obama of being sexist!


Pretzels or tafffy anyone? Call it Palpain


Edit 9-12-08 1:56, I asked if a similar question and some whiner had it deleted :


';if Obama was trying to insult Palin wwouldn'the say a bithc wearing lipstick does not make her a lady? ';


I also asked why Republicans blame the wrong people for the actions of of those incharge instead if those responsible? and that was deleted too, some enjoy having a disctatorship,- unreal, they will probably delete my answer now too, and ive had cons tell me ';your stupid and you think you are smart and blah blah'; I guess they want to keep things the same way they are now!
Yes as she made no reference to the gender of the dog. She said there was a difference between Hockey moms and pitbulls, not hockey moms and female pitbulls. Also she never called herself a pitbull. she called herself a Hockey mom. Education is free at public schools.
This whole conversation is outrangeous. Show some intelligence and just listen to what is being said instead of adding words and meanings. This is exactly what the media does. Let's get down to issues and quit letting the media or some hairbrain idea of what is not said decide the way you vote. Research the issues!!!!
I still haven't figured out why there haven't been more protests from owners of pitbulls. If i owned a pitbull, i would be outraged that Sarah Palin would compare herself to my dog. I have met many pitbulls with better personalities than Palin.
Yes he would be and no she didn't. what she said was that the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom is lipstick. that in no way implies that hockey moms are pit bulls, female or otherwise, just that they are very much alike..
I think he would %26amp; ask McCain since one reporter referred to Hillary as one %26amp; McCain didn't say anything but laughed at it. What if Obama had done this if a reporter called Sarah that %26amp; he laughed, man all heck would break loose
She didn't call herself a dog. It was a metaphor. Do you understand what jokes are? And metaphors? Or analogies? Or anything?
the McCain campaign will say so.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
hosting services